Files
invoiceninja-sdk/GOALS.md
T
awkawbandClaude Opus 5 fbde9a9bb7 Write down the project's goals, non-goals, and roadmap
Several decisions in here look like oversights until you know the
reasoning: the curated model subset with everything else in `extra`, the
still-generic `chart`, not retrying `POST`, the deliberate divergences
from the official PHP SDK. That reasoning was spread across code
comments and commit messages, where it is easy to miss and easy to
"fix".

GOALS.md states:

- What the crate is for: complete coverage, and not quietly losing data,
  truncating results, or succeeding when it did not.
- Seven goals, each tied to a decision visible in the code, so the
  rationale survives the next refactor.
- Non-goals, including no sync API, no caching or ORM layer, no
  modelling of every field, and no retrying of non-idempotent requests.
- Publication posture: on crates.io, pre-1.0, no stability promise, pin
  an exact version. MSRV may rise with dependencies.
- A roadmap ordering the COVERAGE.md gaps by value over effort, starting
  with multipart uploads, which is the only thing blocking
  `create_document`.
- Open questions, left open rather than papered over: whether auth routes
  belong here at all given they are a different auth model, whether
  per-chart types earn their keep, streaming for large exports, and the
  untested `Error::PaginationLimit`.

README, COVERAGE.md, and CLAUDE.md link to it. No changelog entry: this
adds no behaviour, per the rule in CLAUDE.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 19:25:59 -04:00

162 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown

# Goals
What this crate is trying to be, what it is deliberately not, and what is
still open. The point of writing this down is that several decisions here
look like oversights until you know the reasoning — this is where the
reasoning lives.
## What this is for
A complete, honest async Rust client for the Invoice Ninja v5 API.
*Complete* in that every endpoint the API exposes should eventually be
reachable through it. *Honest* in that it should not quietly lose data,
quietly truncate results, or quietly succeed when it did not.
## Goals
### 1. Never lose data in a round trip
A `get` followed by an `update` must not drop fields the crate does not know
about. Every model carries `#[serde(flatten)] extra`, and the modelled
fields are a curated subset rather than an attempt at the whole schema.
This is why `custom_value1..4`, `custom_surcharge1..4`, and fields with
ambiguous upstream types are intentionally unmodelled — `extra` carries them
losslessly, whereas a wrong concrete type is a hard decode error that breaks
the entire response.
### 2. Tolerate upstream inconsistency, fail on real problems
Invoice Ninja returns `null` for many nominally-string fields, and the same
field name can differ in type across resources (`frequency_id` is a number on
recurring invoices and a string on subscriptions; `/statics` returns
`payment_types.id` as a string and every other table's as a number).
Decoding should absorb that — hence `null_to_default` and `id_as_string` —
without becoming so permissive that genuine errors pass silently.
### 3. Prefer a loud failure to a quiet wrong answer
The bug worth remembering: `list_all_*` used to stop when a page came back
shorter than requested, which the server's `per_page` cap made wrong, so it
returned a partial list indistinguishable from a complete one. Silent
truncation is the worst failure mode this crate can have.
Concretely: pagination terminates on the paginator's own `total_pages`, a
runaway walk raises `Error::PaginationLimit` rather than returning what it
has, and an id that cannot safely be a path segment is rejected instead of
being mangled into a request against a different endpoint.
### 4. Be safe by default where the API handles money
`POST` is never replayed on a 5xx or a timeout, because the server may have
applied it before the response was lost and a retry would create a second
invoice, payment, or email. A 429 is retried for any method, because the
server states it refused the request without processing it.
When a safety default and a convenience conflict here, safety wins, and the
reasoning goes in a comment so it is not later optimised away.
### 5. Make failures diagnosable
An error should say enough to act on. Decode failures carry an excerpt of
the body that actually arrived, because "expected value at line 1 column 1"
does not reveal that a proxy returned an HTML error page. API errors keep
the whole per-field `errors` map, not just the first message.
### 6. Verify against the source, not against assumptions
Field names and types come from Invoice Ninja's `openapi/api-docs.yaml`; the
set of endpoints comes from `routes/api.php` and the controllers, because
the published spec is incomplete for routes. Claims in `COVERAGE.md` are
checked against the upstream repository rather than inferred.
### 7. Stay testable without credentials
The whole suite runs offline: model decoding against fixtures, request
plumbing against a `wiremock` server on loopback. Nobody should need an
Invoice Ninja account to contribute.
## Non-goals
- **Not a port of the official PHP SDK.** It is a useful cross-check, but
thinner, and two of its behaviours are bugs not to copy. See the
comparison in `COVERAGE.md`. The divergences — JSON instead of
`form_params`, keeping the whole validation `errors` map, exposing bulk
`download` only on PDF-rendering entities — are deliberate.
- **No sync/blocking API.** Async only.
- **No ORM, session, or caching layer.** The crate wraps endpoints. It does
not model relationships between entities or cache responses, beyond
advising that `/statics` is worth caching.
- **No modelling of every field.** See goal 1; breadth of endpoints is a
goal, breadth of typed fields is not.
- **No retrying of non-idempotent requests.** See goal 4.
- **No API stability before 1.0.** See below.
## Publication and compatibility
Published on crates.io so it is installable, with **no stability promise
before 1.0**. Pin an exact version; expect breaking changes in minor
releases. `CHANGELOG.md` records them, and breaking changes should be
legible there rather than discovered at compile time.
`Error` is `#[non_exhaustive]` so that adding variants is not itself a
breaking change.
**MSRV is 1.88**, set by the dependency graph rather than by this crate's
code. It may rise when dependencies require it; that is a changelog entry,
not a blocker. It should never rise because a convenience API was used
without checking — see the note in `CLAUDE.md`.
## Roadmap: closing the coverage gaps
All 34 `Route::resource` groups are wrapped. Full coverage is the target, so
`COVERAGE.md`'s gap list is a to-do list, not a permanent boundary. Roughly
in order of value over effort:
1. **Multipart uploads** — 16 `PUT /{resource}/{id}/upload` routes plus
`edocument/upload`. Blocked only on enabling reqwest's `multipart`
feature. This is also what makes `create_document` possible, so it
unblocks the one obviously missing piece of an otherwise complete
resource.
2. **Per-resource extras** — mechanical, and they reuse existing patterns:
`webhooks/{id}/retry`, `tasks/sort`, `designs/set/default`,
`client_gateway_tokens/{id}/setAsDefault`, `subscriptions/steps`, the
client extras (`updateTaxData`, `show_settings`, `check_vat`, …), the
bank-integration and company-gateway extras.
3. **Password-protected actions** — `with_api_password` already makes these
reachable; only the methods are missing. Client purge and merge, vendor
merge, company purge, user invite and purge.
4. **Preview, activities, and email history** — distinct response shapes, so
each needs its own hand-written method and probably its own model.
5. **Public invitation-key downloads** — eight routes that take no auth
token, so they do not fit the authenticated request path and need a
different entry point.
6. **Import/export and the integrations** — Stripe, QuickBooks, einvoice
(17 routes), Yodlee, Nordigen, calendar. The largest block and the least
SDK-shaped; worth doing last and possibly in pieces.
Keep `COVERAGE.md` current as these land — it names exact counts, so it goes
stale quietly.
## Open questions
These are genuinely undecided. Deciding one is a change to this file.
- **Auth routes** (`/login`, `/logout`, `/refresh`, passkeys) are in the gap
list, but they are a different authentication model from the API token
this client is built around. Including them may mean a second client type
rather than more methods on this one. Not obviously in scope.
- **`chart` is still generic** over `T: DeserializeOwned`, because the
eleven chart endpoints share no response shape. Per-chart structs would
be eleven small models of unstable payloads; unclear whether that earns
its keep.
- **Large responses are buffered entirely into memory.** PDF downloads and
CSV report exports go through `Vec<u8>`. Streaming would be better for
big exports but changes those signatures.
- **`Error::PaginationLimit` has no test**, because reaching it needs
10,001 mock round trips. Making `MAX_PAGES` injectable purely for a test
may be worse than the gap.
- **When to go 1.0**, and what the API needs to settle first.