`Cargo.toml` named github.com/bryant/invoiceninjars, a guess from the
git author name that was never a real repository. It now points at the
mirror that actually exists, so the crates.io "Repository" link will
resolve.
Gitea is the source of truth and a push mirror copies every commit to
GitHub. Anything written to the GitHub copy is overwritten by the next
sync, so a merged pull request there would silently vanish. README and
GOALS.md say so, and direct issues and pull requests to Gitea.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"No ORM, session, or caching layer" bundled several decisions with very
different costs, and read as refusing things that are in fact fine.
Split into the three that genuinely conflict, each with its reason:
lazy loading (models would have to hold a client handle, breaking
`Default`-constructibility and the `extra` round trip), dirty tracking
(cannot diff a flattened map of unmodelled fields), and transparent
entity caching.
The caching reason is the one worth recording: `BaseController`'s shared
response path sends no `ETag`, `If-None-Match`, or `Cache-Control`, so a
cached entity cannot be cheaply revalidated. On an API that handles money
that is a correctness hazard rather than a missed optimisation. Writing
the evidence down so the question is not reopened without it.
Two things the old wording excluded by accident are now open questions
instead: typed `include` helpers, since eager loading is a stringly
parameter where a typo is a silent no-op; and an opt-in cache for
`/statics`, which is near-constant and not money. Also parks the
`updated_at` delta-sync parameter as the shape a local mirror would
need, noted as a different product rather than a plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Several decisions in here look like oversights until you know the
reasoning: the curated model subset with everything else in `extra`, the
still-generic `chart`, not retrying `POST`, the deliberate divergences
from the official PHP SDK. That reasoning was spread across code
comments and commit messages, where it is easy to miss and easy to
"fix".
GOALS.md states:
- What the crate is for: complete coverage, and not quietly losing data,
truncating results, or succeeding when it did not.
- Seven goals, each tied to a decision visible in the code, so the
rationale survives the next refactor.
- Non-goals, including no sync API, no caching or ORM layer, no
modelling of every field, and no retrying of non-idempotent requests.
- Publication posture: on crates.io, pre-1.0, no stability promise, pin
an exact version. MSRV may rise with dependencies.
- A roadmap ordering the COVERAGE.md gaps by value over effort, starting
with multipart uploads, which is the only thing blocking
`create_document`.
- Open questions, left open rather than papered over: whether auth routes
belong here at all given they are a different auth model, whether
per-chart types earn their keep, streaming for large exports, and the
untested `Error::PaginationLimit`.
README, COVERAGE.md, and CLAUDE.md link to it. No changelog entry: this
adds no behaviour, per the rule in CLAUDE.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
awkawbandClaude Opus 5